• Actual
  • Law and the media
  • Helpful
  • Work areas and campaigns
  • Reviews and monitoring
  • EFJ calls on the UN Human Rights Council to create an accountability mechanism on Belarus

    Belarus’ human rights situation has deteriorated further in recent weeks. The European Federation of Journalists (EFJ) believes this deterioration should be viewed in the context of the grave and systemic human rights violations the authorities committed in the run-up to the 2020 fraudulent presidential election and in its aftermath, for which there has been no accountability. The EFJ joins Amnesty International, the International Federation for Human Rights and Article19 in demanding action by the UN Human Rights Council to establish a new mechanism assisting the process of accountability for human rights violations in Belarus.

    Devel­op­ments in recent weeks mark a sig­nif­i­cant esca­la­tion in Belarus. These includ­ed raids on some of the country’s most respect­ed inde­pen­dent civic organ­i­sa­tions. On 16 Feb­ru­ary 2021, the police raid­ed and searched the cen­tral office of the Belaru­sian Asso­ci­a­tion of Jour­nal­ists (BAJ), the EFJ affil­i­ate in Belarus, and the two Min­sk offices of the Human Rights Cen­ter Vias­na, as well as Viasna’s office in Mahil­ioŭ. Police also searched the cen­tral office of the inde­pen­dent Belaru­sian Radio and Elec­tron­ic Indus­try Work­ers’ Union REP.

    The author­i­ties also con­duct­ed search­es at the homes or offices of more than 40 human rights defend­ers, jour­nal­ists and their rel­a­tives in Mahil­ioŭ, Brest, Vicieb­sk, Homieĺ, Mazyr, Rečy­ca, Baranav­ičy among oth­er cities. There were reports of exces­sive use of police force against indi­vid­u­als while police seized phones, com­put­ers, mon­ey, cred­it cards and even children’s dig­i­tal tablets and mon­ey. In most of these cas­es, the raids and search­es are part of a crim­i­nal inves­ti­ga­tion in which the gov­ern­ment is false­ly equat­ing the legit­i­mate work of jour­nal­ists and human rights defend­ers with financ­ing mass dis­tur­bances.

    Recent weeks have also seen the wide-rang­ing tar­get­ing of jour­nal­ists. Two jour­nal­ists, Kat­syary­na Andree­va Bakhvala­va, and Darya Chultso­va, were sen­tenced to two years in prison on 18 Feb­ru­ary for doing noth­ing more than doc­u­ment­ing peace­ful demon­stra­tions in Novem­ber. On 2 March, TUT.BY jour­nal­ist Kate­ri­na Bori­se­vich was sen­tenced to six months in prison and a fine, after she had con­tra­dict­ed offi­cial state­ments about the death of a pro­test­er, Roman Bon­darenko, who the author­i­ties sug­gest­ed was drunk at the time.

    The recent report of the Unit­ed Nations High Com­mis­sion­er for Human Rights, Michelle Bachelet, describes “a human rights cri­sis of a mag­ni­tude unprece­dent­ed in Belarus”. “Jour­nal­ists have been rou­tine­ly detained in the con­text of the protests, even when they clear­ly iden­ti­fied them­selves as such with their press cards, with­out regard for their pro­tec­tion under inter­na­tion­al human rights law to exer­cise their func­tions of report­ing dur­ing assem­blies. Between 9 August and 20 Decem­ber, 384 jour­nal­ists were arrest­ed, 80 were sen­tenced to admin­is­tra­tive deten­tion, sev­er­al were fined, and 62 report­ed­ly expe­ri­enced vio­lence and beat­ings. Some jour­nal­ists were placed in pre­tri­al deten­tion and faced crim­i­nal charges, among them TuT.BY jour­nal­ist Kat­ya­ri­na Bari­se­vich, for alleged­ly dis­clos­ing con­fi­den­tial med­ical records while prepar­ing an arti­cle about Roman Bon­darenko. There have been numer­ous reports of the author­i­ties revok­ing the accred­i­ta­tion of jour­nal­ists, includ­ing for­eign media cor­re­spon­dents, sev­er­al of whom were arrest­ed and deport­ed from Belarus fol­low­ing the elec­tions.”

    Michelle Bachelet calls on the gov­erne­ment of Belarus to “imme­di­ate­ly and uncon­di­tion­al­ly release all those unlaw­ful­ly or arbi­trar­i­ly detained for peace­ful­ly exer­cis­ing their free­doms of expres­sion, asso­ci­a­tion and peace­ful assem­bly or their legit­i­mate func­tions, includ­ing human rights defend­ers, jour­nal­ists and lawyers, and cease and reverse any admin­is­tra­tive or crim­i­nal judi­cial action against peo­ple for exer­cis­ing their human rights, includ­ing the rights to free­doms of expres­sion and peace­ful assem­bly”.

    With regard to free­dom of expres­sion and opin­ion, the High Com­mis­sion­er rec­om­mends that the gov­ern­ment:

    Revise the Law on Mass Media to bring it into line with inter­na­tion­al stan­dards, in par­tic­u­lar by:

    (i) Repeal­ing manda­to­ry accred­i­ta­tion as a pre­req­ui­site for exer­cis­ing the pro­fes­sion of jour­nal­ist of either online or offline media;

    (ii) Trans­form­ing the per­mis­sion-based media reg­is­tra­tion pro­ce­dure into a sim­ple, trans­par­ent and non-dis­crim­i­na­to­ry noti­fi­ca­tion sys­tem admin­is­tered by an inde­pen­dent body;

    (iii) Align­ing reg­u­la­tion and restric­tions on the Inter­net with inter­na­tion­al stan­dards, and bring­ing the restrict­ing or block­ing of web­sites under the sole author­i­ty of courts, with the nec­es­sary safe­guards and pos­si­bil­i­ty for appeal;

    Ful­ly decrim­i­nal­ize defama­tion and abstain from using extrem­ism laws to repress free­dom of expres­sion.

    “The inter­na­tion­al com­mu­ni­ty can­not remain pas­sive in the face of the refusal of dia­logue and the inten­si­fi­ca­tion of repres­sion by Mr Lukashenko’s regime,” said EFJ Pres­i­dent Mogens Blich­er Bjer­regård. “New diplo­mat­ic weapons are need­ed to stop the con­tin­u­ing vio­la­tions of human rights and press free­dom.”

    The UN Spe­cial Rap­por­teur on Belarus, Anais Marin, con­tin­ues to be denied the oppor­tu­ni­ty to engage direct­ly with the author­i­ties or trav­el to the coun­try. His man­date remains an essen­tial mech­a­nism for long-term mon­i­tor­ing of the sit­u­a­tion in Belarus. How­ev­er, the Human Rights Coun­cil must ele­vate its response to meet the needs of the cur­rent cri­sis, par­tic­u­lar­ly to ensure account­abil­i­ty. It is there­fore essen­tial that the Human Rights Coun­cil, as the pre­mier glob­al human rights body, shows lead­er­ship to facil­i­tate a process of account­abil­i­ty through the cre­ation of a new mech­a­nism that can lead to iden­ti­fy­ing per­pe­tra­tors and hold­ing them to account. This mech­a­nism should have the fol­low­ing ele­ments:

    A man­date to col­lect, pre­serve and analyse human rights vio­la­tions, and where pos­si­ble to iden­ti­fy those respon­si­ble;

    A man­date to pro­vide guid­ance and rec­om­men­da­tions on access to jus­tice and account­abil­i­ty for human rights vio­la­tions;

    Com­ple­men­tar­i­ty with exist­ing region­al and civ­il soci­ety-led ini­tia­tives to doc­u­ment seri­ous vio­la­tions.

    The EFJ joins this demand, co-signed by Amnesty Inter­na­tion­al, Arti­cle 19, Barys Zvozskau Belaru­sian Human Rights House, CIVICUS: World Alliance for Cit­i­zen Par­tic­i­pa­tion, Civ­il Rights Defend­ers, FIDH – Inter­na­tion­al Fed­er­a­tion for Human Rights, Human Rights House Foun­da­tion, Human Rights Watch, Inter­na­tion­al Bar Association’s Human Rights Insti­tute (IBAHRI), Inter­na­tion­al Com­mis­sion of Jurists (ICJ), RAZAM.CH (Swiss-Belaru­sian Asso­ci­a­tion), World Organ­i­sa­tion Against Tor­ture (OMCT).

    The most important news and materials in our Telegram channel — subscribe!
    @bajmedia
    Most read
    Every day send to your mailbox: actual offers (grants, vacancies, competitions, scholarships), announcements of events (lectures, performances, presentations, press conferences) and good content.

    Subscribe

    * indicates required

    By subscribing to the newsletter, you agree to the Privacy Policy